https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2246
--- Comment #7 from [email protected] --- We thought that the single "PAMServiceName service-%m" is a better design (suggested by Damien Miller on 2014-07-03) over our PAMServiceName and PAMServicePrefix enhancements. However, I have not received any response, even though I have asked for feedback on my submitted implementation many times since August of last year. We will choose the "PAMServiceName service-%m" design, if OpenSSH.org will confirm that you will incorporate this design (an implemenation of which I provided on 2014-11-06) in a future OpenSSH release. Failing that, to prevent an incompatibility issue during upgrade, we will use our original two option design. The PAM state and PAM account bugs in the original patch file (submitted on 2014-06-19) have been fixed. A new patch file for the two-option PAM enhancement was attached in this bug a few minutes ago. Please re-evaluate these enhancements and let us know your decision. Thanks, Huie-Ying Lee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
