https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1768
Jakub Jelen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelen <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 2523 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2523&action=edit patch to improve error message Hi, I ran into this problem in RHBZ#1142223 [1] and tried to solve it. After some time of digging in the source code I came up with solution which I introduce here as a attachment. This added condition covers only this one problematic case and according to regression test cases published in portable tarbal, shouldn't bring here any regression. Also I managed to write test case covering this problem. This file will be attached as the second file. Also I would like to say that the previous patch doesn't work, because it will break recursive scp, for example: > scp -r dir/ host:new_dir/ which is completely valid even if the new_dir doesn't exist. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142223 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
