Several months back the policy concerning viewer-beta and viewer-*development 

development not release.



>________________________________
> From: Nicky Perian <nickyper...@yahoo.com>
>To: Lance Corrimal <lance.corri...@eregion.de>; 
>"opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com" <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com> 
>Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 6:16 AM
>Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] what happened to posting codereview requests 
>against viewer-development?
> 
>
>Several months back the policy concerning viewer-beta and viewer-release 
>changed with those repositories being subject to changed history. I think this 
>was to allow LL to develop features in private and then push them directly to 
>viewer-release and then reset viewer-beta and viewer-development to 
>viewer-release. The next reason was having in-work patches that were being 
>worked by OS-DEV's and  and LL that were later not adopted be subject to hg 
>strip and therefore screwing history again. It was also stated at the time 
>that all OS-DEV submissions be against viewer-release. Subsequently 
>viewer-development was removed from code review and viewer-release 
>added. These changes were to discourage the TPV community from moving on a WIP 
>feature and publishing a TPV version to the WIP before LL.
>
>
>IMO, it sucks.
>
>
>Nicky
> 
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Lance Corrimal <lance.corri...@eregion.de>
>>To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com 
>>Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 2:54 AM
>>Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] what happened to posting codereview requests 
>>against viewer-development?
>> 
>>Is there any particular reason why I still cannot file a CR against viewer-
>>development, even though the latest version of "the official policy" as 
>>posted 
>>by Oz on this list roughly a week ago or two said that patches should be 
>>based 
>>on viewer-development?
>>
>>
>>
>>Am Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, 11:16:20 schrieb Lance Corrimal:
>>> I'm trying to post a CR for a fix for VWR-29531, but I can't select viewer-
>>> development as repository... which makes posting the CR meaningless, since
>>> the bug has not moved into viewer-beta or viewer-release yet.
>>> 
>>> What's going on there?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> bye,
>>> LC
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>>> privileges
>>_______________________________________________
>>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
>
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to