As I understand.
1. Code reviews are against viewer-release only.
2. With viewer-development and viewer-beta, LL retains the right (not
intention) to strip features and bug fixes at any time.
3. The development loop is closed at viewer-release and at times both
viewer-release and viewer-beta can be reset to viewer-release. This reset would
occur to remove all traces of an not in viewer-release feature.
IMO, it is fairly safe (not 100%) for TPV's to develop against viewer-beta.
Nicky
>________________________________
> From: Boroondas Gupte <slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch>
>To: Second Life Open Source Developer Mailing List
><opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com>; Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
><o...@lindenlab.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:18 PM
>Subject: [opensource-dev] HG-Repositories
>
>
>From recent changes on the wiki, I take that the role of the various official
>mercurial repositories has changed again. Which repository should
>contributions be based on, now? And which one is now the recommended base for
>third party viewers?
>
>Cheers,
>B.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
>
_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
