On 04/24/2011 03:52 AM, Chuck Baggett wrote: > Is the link > http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/viewer-pre-release/rev/227447/index.html > is supposed to go to a page that shows good contrast? It's supposed to show at least /better/ contrast than http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/cg_viewer-development/rev/227100/index.html
> I get the impression that is supposed to be the case based on what I'm > reading here, but when I look at the page and I see pale grey letters > on medium drab green background I find it hard to believe that anyone > could think that is a desirable amount of contrast. Color perception is widely different from person to person and from monitor to monitor. In the newer version (227447), I see almost-black letters on light teal background, and have no problems to read the text like that. Probably, the light teal (or drab green, as you call it) could be made yet brighter, as its contrast to the surrounding background (white) or interior background (light grey) is less important than the contrast to the text. Alternatively (or additionally), the text could be make full black. I didn't go full black in my user style (on which CG based the newer stylesheet), because I didn't want to deviate too much from CG's original design. Cheers, Boroondas
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
