It is still a (serious) bug. The viewer should have showed '???', not Grumpity.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:44:02AM -0800, Brian McGroarty wrote: > That was the result of a brief load server configuration problem yesterday, > and > it shouldn't repeat. The message didn't come from Grumpity, and the response > wouldn't have gone back to Grumpity either. The viewer simply didn't know > which > cached name to use. -- Carlo Wood <ca...@alinoe.com> _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
