>From the "see above", I'd gather that the reason is that LL dislikes parts of the 1.x UI about as much as they now dislike parts the 2.x one. Both UIs have well-publicized strikes against them now; I think an attempt to make changes *away* from that 1.x status quo has been well-justified for a long time (even if that might not seem as true for all the changes *to* where 2.0.0 ended up at). Thus I'd agree with Yoz's request to look for ideas that are improvements on both 1.x and 2.x, instead of just going back to 1.x blindly.
Celi On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Gigs <gigstagg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 09/20/2010 09:30 PM, Yoz Grahame wrote: > > If you're asking about reverting the entire viewer UI to 1.x: in short, > > no. In less short, we'd need an objective, well-reasoned argument > > against each and every one of the several hundred UI changes between 1.x > > and 2.x. See above. > > > Why would the burden be that way? Linden Lab changed the status quo, > they should be the ones justifying their new design, not the other way > around. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
