There isn't anything in the policy itself which says you must be listed, there is however a note on the directory page warning users to be wary of unlisted viewers.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Will <wdema...@verizon.net> wrote: > hmm ok I may be wrong but remember a rush to update viewers from the > approved list, didn't look over my shoulder and just for good housekeeping I > don't venture from approved viewers. Seriously hope you are wrong or there > will be little to no control over who gets to connect. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Gareth Nelson" <gar...@garethnelson.com> > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 3:25 PM > To: "Will" <wdema...@verizon.net> > Cc: "Lance Corrimal" <lance.corri...@eregion.de>; > <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com> > Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is > the policy worth anything? > >> As I understand it, you don't need to be in the list, just comply with >> the policy. >> >> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Will <wdema...@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>> They may be waiting to make a formal announcement before they pull the >>> plug >>> on the viewer- didn't they make a policy of not allowing any viewer to >>> connect that wasn't on the list? I think so- >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Gareth Nelson" <gar...@garethnelson.com> >>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 2:50 PM >>> To: "Lance Corrimal" <lance.corri...@eregion.de> >>> Cc: <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com> >>> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: >>> is >>> the policy worth anything? >>> >>>> As they shouldn't be! >>>> Although one does wonder whether users are now at risk of being banned >>>> if they keep using it >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Lance Corrimal >>>> <lance.corri...@eregion.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Am Sunday 22 August 2010 schrieb L. Christopher Bird: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Barnett <jess...@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Ignoring this and giving the all clear with no other action taken >>>>>> > on the part of Linden Lab will instead demonstrate that the TPV >>>>>> > is a worthless scrap of paper. >>>>>> >>>>>> Correction, it only exist on paper if printed. The proper phrase is >>>>>> "a worthless configuration of pixels" >>>>>> >>>>>> The TPVP makes it clear what the consequences are for breaking the >>>>>> policy. 8c says: >>>>>> >>>>>> "If a Third-Party Viewer or your use or distribution of it violates >>>>>> this Policy or any Linden Lab policy, your permission to access >>>>>> Second Life using the Third-Party Viewer shall terminate >>>>>> automatically. You acknowledge and agree that we may require you >>>>>> to stop using or distributing a Third-Party Viewer for accessing >>>>>> Second Life if we determine that there is a violation." >>>>>> >>>>>> So either the lab will enforce this, or they will say "Well you are >>>>>> so popular you can screw around all you want". Is Emerald the >>>>>> viewer "too big to fail"? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- ZenMondo >>>>> >>>>> I just looked and emerald's not in the tpv directory anymore. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >>>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >>>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >>>>> privileges >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for >>>> everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - >>>> Printcrime by Cory Doctrow >>>> >>>> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. >>>> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: >>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev >>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting >>>> privileges >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for >> everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - >> Printcrime by Cory Doctrow >> >> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. >> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > > -- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
