Agreed, I think most users treat the viewers on that directory as having
been approved for use by Linden Lab.  Sort of a 'good housekeeping seal of
approval' for the SL grid, if you will.

On Aug 22, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Gareth Nelson wrote:

> Being listed in the directory is a sign that viewer devs have
> self-certified compliance, but it's also an unconcious sign to users
> that the viewer is legit, even if not intended.
> 
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 3:56 PM, JB Hancroft <jbhancr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ann,
>> 
>> You suggested:  "What I think LL should consider is something in the TPV
>> policy that prohibits any tpv from connecting to any non LL server for any
>> reason when a LL grid is selected for login."
>> 
>> I'd change that to require that any TPV disclose the specifics of any and
>> all non-LL servers that they are connecting to, and the details of why they
>> are doing so.  Otherwise, some of the possible value-added functionality
>> gets crippled.
>> 
>> The real issue here is the TPVP is just legal CYA for LL, it's not something
>> they actually monitor or enforce.
>> There is no assurance being provided by LL or by the TPV developer, that
>> they have any sense of reasonable security, including processes that limit
>> rogue devs from pulling the kind of stunts that the Emerald team seem to
>> favor.
>> 
>> If the TPVP really matters, we'll see Emerald shut down from the TPVP
>> program, because of this accumulated nonsense.
>> If not, then it confirms that it's all just a paper chase.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> - JB
>> 
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Ann Otoole <missannoto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I hate replying to a policy thread here but will make this one time
>>> exception for my humble input for LL's consideration:
>>> 
>>> What I think LL should consider is something in the TPV policy that
>>> prohibits any tpv from connecting to any non LL server for any reason when a
>>> LL grid is selected for login. This simple policy, if correctly followed,
>>> would have prevented the incident. It would also eliminate a tpv team from
>>> monitoring logins and usage but then where exactly did they get to do that
>>> in the first place? It is a missed policy bullet. There is no reason a
>>> client should connect to anything except an LL server when an LL grid is
>>> selected. LL needs to be totally security conscious about the login process
>>> and what rigid requirements must be met for connecting to the LL grids.
>>> 
>>> I.e.; I watch my port activity. Everyone should. But not everyone would
>>> know what they are looking at. But had they been watching I bet they would
>>> have been wanting to know what all those connections to that host were all
>>> about right away. Had I been using Emerald and saw thirty something
>>> connections to iheartanime dot com appear I would have been raising hell
>>> immediately. What you connect to on the internet can be and is monitored
>>> sometimes and being open to forced connections to something really bad would
>>> be extremely unfortunate for many that have tom be squeaky clean.
>>> 
>>> I use Kirstens and I don't even care much for it's connection for motd.
>>> However it does tell me when the latest release is available and that is
>>> very useful information. Maybe there is a way for LL to provide motd bullets
>>> for tpvs so they can get the word out about updates or something.
>>> 
>>> There has to be a better way.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> 
>>> Ann Otoole InSL
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Brian McGroarty <s...@lindenlab.com>
>>> To: Thomas Grimshaw <t...@streamsense.net>
>>> Cc: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>>> Sent: Sat, August 21, 2010 10:33:52 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers:
>>> is the policy worth anything?
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Thomas Grimshaw <t...@streamsense.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>  Loading 1mb of content per user is hardly a denial of service attack.
>>>> Crosslinking occurs everywhere on the web, this is simply nothing but
>>>> paranoid bull.
>>> 
>>> "Crosslinking" drops the context of hiding gibberish requests to a
>>> critic's website in a hidden frame that will never be revealed to the
>>> user. This isn't a mere hyperlink to another page or naively stealing
>>> someone else's image hosting.
>>> 
>>> My read (but I'm no lawyer) is that this looks like 2.d.iii of
>>> http://secondlife.com/corporate/tpv.php and we're already having that
>>> discussion. If anyone can come up with specific reasons why this might
>>> have had legitimate reason to be there, or how this one could be yet
>>> another oversight or mistake, that would be helpful. I sure haven't
>>> heard any to date.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Brian McGroarty | Linden Lab
>>> Sent from my Newton MP2100 via acoustic coupler
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>>> privileges
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>>> privileges
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting
>> privileges
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for
> everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” -
> Printcrime by Cory Doctrow
> 
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> _______________________________________________
> Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
> http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
> Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to