On 2010-08-17 20:00, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking at my backlog of SNOW bugs and I'm really missing right > now a "Snowstorm x.x" version in the "Fixed revision(s)" field. > Especially after this afternoon meeting where everyone agreed to work > off Snowstorm only and let SG2.x dies. For instance, there a JIRA > issue (http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SNOW-646) that we discussed > with WolfPup on IRC that would be great to add to the Snowstorm backlog. > > Anyway, it's easy enough to add but we need to agree on what to add > and a couple of other things: > * SNOW product: I think I read somewhere that we will be using VWR and > not SNOW for Snowstorm bugs. Correct? (I'm fine with it... just asking > for clarification...). If correct, I'll start moving JIRAs from SNOW > to VWR when I see fit.
That's correct. > * Affect versions: either way, how do we identify versions now? For > instance, issues in the current lindenlab/viewer-development repo > should be marked as what? I suppose "Viewer 2.1.1"... good question... Esbee is owns version numbering, I suspect we should change to either 2.1.2 or 2.2.0 but let's let her weigh in. > * Fixed versions: this is trickier, as we're moving with a bi monthly > release schedule, we're going to increment that number quite fast. > Again, fine with me but we need to create "Viewer 2.1.2" and a couple > of others as well as a "Viewer 2.x" to park issues that are not on the > backlog at all. Well, if I'm not mistaken, viewers built from the viewer-development branch will also have the _DEVELOPMENT at the end of the version string - do we really need to increment any of the first three until they go to Beta and Release? _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
