*'like the entire world being a 4 x 4 inch area to work from in the middle of my 22" widescreen with great big blacked-out edges to fill-in around that 4 x 4 inch area.'* * * The issue above is most likely a display driver issue with your current configuration. I wouldn't think that this is an issue with the 2.X platform.
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by Douglas Adams On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Andromeda Quonset < andromedaquon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sighs. I see you misunderstood. Perhaps I have, too, in usage of > the word "Resident". > > In my post, where I referenced "Andromeda Resident", change that to > "Andromeda DisplayName" > > In a script that has been compiled to use a new function, presumably > compiled under a 2.X viewer, when an AV that is logged-in under a 1.X > viewer, and activates the script compiled under 2.X, will need to > have results returned to him based on a 1.X compilation, and not a > 2.X compilation in order to not cause a runtime error. > > I doubt I will be doing any scripting anytime soon in a Client 2 > environment, given the major issues I have with viewer, like the > entire world being a 4 x 4 inch area to work from in the middle of my > 22" widescreen with great big blacked-out edges to fill-in around > that 4 x 4 inch area. And there is the issue of the script editor > being seriously broken. Can't edit scripts without a script > editor. And there is the issue of doing an uninstall of the 2.X > client, and having it delete 5 years of chat dialog as it tidies up > after itself. > > Best thing as I see it is to not implement it. Maybe in 2012 we can > look revisit it. > > At 04:54 PM 8/17/2010, you wrote: > >This is correct. Andromeda Quonset will be Andromeda Quonset forever. > >At some point, new residents won't be able to choose a last name - > >only these will be "Resident" > > > >No existing script function will return different results than it does > >today. New script functions are added for fetching/referencing Display > >Names. > > > >On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Erik Anderson > ><eri...@odysseus.anderson.name> wrote: > > > My interpretation of what was said is that the script using a 2.X > viewer > > > would NOT say "Andromeda Resident", SL is just stating that users in > the > > > future will not be asked for a last name when they sign up, all new > users > > > after that point would have a last name of "Resident", which the > > 2.X viewers > > > would likely hide. > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Andromeda Quonset > > > <andromedaquon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> It appears to me that if I create a script using viewer 1.X, it will > > >> show as being created by Andromeda Quonset. It also appears to me > > >> that if I create the same script using a 2.X viewer, that it will say > > >> it was created by Andromeda Resident. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > > > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > > > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > > > privileges > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >Brian McGroarty | Linden Lab > >Sent from my Newton MP2100 via acoustic coupler > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
