If you don't make any changes do you still need to change the name? I commonly update by doing an svn update and recompile, and believed I was being 100% complaint - is this incorrect?
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut <me...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > Hi Johnnie, > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Johnnie Carling <johnniecarl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Well it's probably a bit late to ask this but.... >> >> I would never call myself a developer, but I do compile the source code >> quite >> a bit... playing with compiler flags, trying patches from the JIRA and >> etc... >> >> After a quick read, its looking like I have to give any viewer I compile a >> name and version. correct? (section 1.b. of the Policy on Third-Party >> Viewers) >> > > If you're using the Snowglobe svn repo, the channel will be set to > "Snowglobe Test Build" and this is good enough under the policy considering > the changes you're making (thanks for testing patches BTW... :) ). > > If you distribute your build to friends though (you don't mention doing this > but, just saying...) you may want to modify that name (see > llcommon/llversionviewer.h). > > Cheers, > - Merov > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > -- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
