Henri Beauchamp <sl...@free.fr> wrote .. > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:41:50 -0700, Rob Nelson wrote: > > > This is a bad idea, as the TPV violators would merely migrate to a > > non-blacklisted viewer. > > If they do, and after some time, the only non-blacklisted viewers > left will be the TPV compliant ones, so that's actually a good thing...
No, maintaining a WHITELIST is way better. And I am thinking not of the bad guys now but the regular users who just want to use a client with additional features. With a whitelist they know: this I can use without problems. With a blacklist they never know if a client NOT on the list is a good one or a bad one that just didn't make it into the blacklist yet. And for the bad guys: they would just rename their client if their old one got on the blacklist. And do this each time again. So a whitelist is the only valid solution. Tillie
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
