Compare this list to here: http://lists.ironpython.com/pipermail/users-ironpython.com Although stated as a combined user/dev list and open to related DLR/CLR discussion...: http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
... the signal to noise, on that mail-list, remains much more on the signal side, and it commonly gets more unmoderated traffic than this opensource-dev list. And yes, I brought up ironpython with a shameless plug that Ironpython 2.6 is almost in Debian stable. If anyone has done AST & resource compiles with ironpython probably has hacked their compile to include the entire standard python lib into a single exe, which makes it very easily shippable product with no install complexity for platforms that support Mono/.NET. It would be nice if something like CMake was written in a DLR instead of native, so then any updates to CMake wouldn't need to wait to move out of the experimental cycles of the platforms in order to compile to stable (like Debian Lenny, for example). Also note the potential pluggability of IL/DLR... Ron Festa wrote: > I feel your frustration, however, this is the /*opensource-dev*/ > mailing list *not* the /*snowglobe-dev*/ mailing list. Both SnowGlobe > and TPV's are open source viewers based on Linden Lab's mainline > viewer the only difference is Snowglobe is distributed by LL. > Discussion on policies that effect open source development should be > encouraged. If you only want to see stuff relating to SnowGlobe then > either encourage LL create a snowglobe-dev list or configure your mail > filters to only allow email related to snowglobe to enter your inbox > from this list. > > Ron Festa > Virtual Worlds Admin > Division of Continuing Studies at Rutgers University > PGP key: http://bit.ly/b1ZyhY > Phone: 732-474-8583 > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Jonathan Irvin <djfoxys...@gmail.com > <mailto:djfoxys...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > To Whom It May Concern: > > I'm requesting Linden Lab's response to this inquiry due to the > recent influx of new topic related...or should I say unrelated to > the development of the SnowGlobe viewer.� Lately, when I open my > email, I get 5-10 different topics and responses daily to the > recent changes for the Third Party Viewer policy and I feel that > this is not related to SnowGlobe or related development at all. > > To "clear the pipes", can we please move these discussions to a > different forum or list so valid OpenSource development questions > are not lost in the flames, complaints, and discussions related to > this specific topic? > > I do not feel it is valid in this forum to talk about which > Third-Party Viewers in the directory were already impersonated or > which part of the third party viewer policy they do not like. > > Linden Labs, if you can please isolate this to another forum, I > bet those who are truly interested in the opensource development > of the Second Life viewer would be more in tuned to staying here > rather than wake up to read yet another unproductive "I hate LL > and the TPVP lets get together and share our misery post". > > Respectfully & Best Regards, > > Jonathan Irvin > SL Resident of 5 Years. > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated > posting privileges > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
