a...@skyhighway.com wrote: > Oh, BTW, if you feel like answering this msg or making a comment or > whatever, pls, pretty pls don't drag the TPVP argument into it? 'K? i > mean, yeah, it's important and all, but this isn't that conversation? > > Normally I'd agree, but actually the two issues *are* related. I wouldn't have said a thing about 2.0 if I were reasonably certain I wouldn't get banned for using a TPV. I haven't used LL viewers in a good year or so, and I don't plan to change that. But the TPVP makes users uneasy about using TPVs. That wouldn't be such a problem if 2.0 didn't cause so much trouble, people would just use that instead. But since we're potentially faced with "update or leave", it *is* a problem.
Just my two cents. Maya _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
