Thank you for the heads up Morgaine. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if the "no warranty" clause vanishes from the source code, then does that mean that LL guarantees that the code of the original viewer is bug- free ? We can't guarantee it as open source programmers if the original devs don't in the first place, and they can't expect us to remove it ourselves afterwards, so who is liable for the original defects if a law suit was started because of an exploit ? _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
- [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY&qu... Morgaine
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WA... Maya Remblai
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WA... Boy Lane
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "N... Morgaine
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving &qu... Marine Kelley
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on prese... Marine Kelley
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on p... Gareth Nelson
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note ... Marine Kelley
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving... Morgaine
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on prese... Marine Kelley
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on p... Jesse Barnett
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on prese... Robert Martin
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note on p... Harleen Gretzky
- Re: [opensource-dev] A note ... Lance Corrimal