On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Morgaine <morgaine.din...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Although some people will probably suggest that the *real* likelihood of > getting the sidebar dropped is nil, I think we should take the moral high > ground here and assume that the sidebar too is subject to community > feedback. Let's assume that this is an open development project in which > advice from the community is considered seriously and in which engineering > judgment and commonsense will prevail. > I know that emerald plans to make all those horrible changes optional and thereby greatly improve the UI. I'm sure that almost everyone (all old users for sure) will like their UI more than the UI of 2.0. LL will not be able to take that code from emerald and use it themselves, because of the user agreement stuff. That kinda renders using an open source model useless. Can't benefit from using the GPL. And what about snowglobe? Can we take the patches from emerald and put them in snowglobe? I mean, legally we can (we are GPL-ed), but will LL allow that?
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
