On 2010-03-08, at 19:41, Lear Cale wrote: > Babbage has already said that LSO code will be "charged" 64K even > though it only uses 16K. Perhaps he's changed that decision -- is > that the case?
I'd like some clarification there too, because I read that they'd backed down on that idea (which is good). If they've changed their minds again, I'd like to know. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
