-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Btw, talking about checkered histories, hypotheticly, if someone has had their account suspended for a time because of unfounded accusations of being underage, would that prevent the person from being authorized to offer a client that connects to LL's grid?
On 27/2/2010 01:29, Soft Linden wrote: > I know the question of how to resolve a ban when multiple people are > behind the viewer is in legal's pile. I'm surprised it didn't make the > FAQ, so I'll send a reminder about that ambiguity. > > There are checkered histories for some existing viewer developers, > yes. It's not our policy to talk about specific governance issues -- > we might not even be allowed to do so. But in the general case, people > didn't have healthy project teams to attach to in the past. Now that > those exist, we hope that's the new place that curious people go. > > The era of second chances for serious violations is definitely over, > though. There's no question on this. Part of the reason for having > legal draft this policy is so that in the future, legal can be > directly involved where we see repeated willful violations. > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Jesse Barnett <jess...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thank you for the hard work there Soft. It answers all of the questions I >> have except for this section: >> >> "What is the meaning of the Viewer Directory eligibility requirement that >> "your Second Life accounts must be in good standing, must not be suspended, >> and must never have been permanently banned or terminated"? >> >> This requirement means that if on or after the policy's publication date, on >> February 23, 2010, any of your Second Life accounts are not in good >> standing, are suspended, or are permanently banned or terminated, then you >> and your viewers are ineligible for the Viewer Directory." >> >> So someone that has had an account banned is not eligible for the directory. >> >> What about a team with one or more members who have had their accounts >> banned? >> >> In case of a team dev with a support@ email going to the team and meeting >> the support requirements, then who's contact info has to be supplied? >> >> And if a team is eligible then couldn't a single person or small team just >> replace the front person to be eligible? >> >> In other words; Being a dev requires a very inquisitive mind. This same >> trait can get a person into trouble when they first enter our world. You do >> have some people who have gone to tremendous lengths to help the Second Life >> community at large who have been suspended at some point when they were >> first here. If they are helping then why the limitation? > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuIpHsACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmV9WQCeIlAWNVRTRar/XhNf4zNTfsBs WawAnAo7Yd2CxZzQkXTQ0IhOhus0mcfN =FUKa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
