And now we get griefers spoofing channels specifically to get viewers banned......
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) <mag...@matrisync.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Imaze Rhiano <imaze.rhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Now - one of following scenarios would happen - what I should do - and >> what would be LL's reaction... > > Long story short, it seems clear that as soon as somebody is suspected > of using a ToS-violating viewer, the channel that viewer is running > under will get blocked, and it will fall to the registered owner of > the channel (if any) to figure out what happened and who did it in > order to get their channel restored. Without being able to log on to > Second Life, since your accounts will be suspended. > > Meanwhile, griefers and content copiers will morph automatically to > unblocked channels. Sure, spoofing channels a ToS violation, but so is > greifing and content copying. Just as much a feel-good cop-out as > relying on a handgun ban to stop armed robbery. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges > -- “Lanie, I’m going to print more printers. Lots more printers. One for everyone. That’s worth going to jail for. That’s worth anything.” - Printcrime by Cory Doctrow Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
