Hi Open Source devs,

As you probably saw, we just launched Viewer 2 to public Beta. We've been dark 
for a long time, but it is for good reason: We needed to do a total overhaul of 
our user experience and that's not something best done by a large group. 
Honestly, there are times when we had an awful lot of cooks in the kitchen just 
with our internal team!

We also today are launching Snowglobe 2, the Open Source package of Viewer 2.0. 
Merov has been working really hard to make this happen on the same day that we 
launched the Viewer 2 Public Beta, so please send him lots of love. As I type, 
Merov is pushing the svn repository and updating the Snowglobe wiki.

We've been completely consumed with getting Viewer 2.0 out the door, which is 
why you've heard so little from us about where we plan to go from here. But I 
want to reiterate: We are committed to open source and to supporting the open 
development community. We embrace the notion that this community develops 
viewers that serve the needs of a wide range of Residents while we pursue a 
broader consumer market.

I realize that it frustrates some that we are not a completely "open 
development" project, i.e. we do not do our internal development in a public 
repository. I do not expect this change in the near future. Over time, we hope 
that core components of our code can be developed in the open, while the 
functionality that we wish to keep proprietary can be developed internally. I 
expect us to evolve to a model that is less like Firefox, and more like 
Safari+WebKit, where the core engine is an open development project but the 
high level app is proprietary. Unfortunately, we're not there yet. Our code is 
not yet modular enough to support that model.

There have been many wonderful ideas here recently regarding viewer 
scriptability, and that's definitely an area we intend to pursue. It goes 
hand-in-hand with making a more modular code base. The time hasn't been right 
for us to engage deeply in this conversation; again, we've been quite busy 
getting 2.0 out the door. Once the dust settles from the 2.0  launch and we're 
on track to deliver 2.1 in short order, we'll be back and very interested in 
engaging on this topic.

Thanks for your support and patience.

Regards,
Howard

_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Reply via email to