> On 9/14/10, Eric Andersen wrote:
> 
> > Whatever Apple does or doesn't do, the point I was
> trying to make was that a
> > whole lot of people are willing to not only accept,
> but pay for an operating
> > system that is closed source.  A very large amount
> of OS X source code is
> > open and freely available, so it was a bad example
> of that point.
> 
> The new Solaris and its impending source drops bear
> more resemblance
> to OS X than they do to something completely closed
> source like
> Windows. If you want Windows source you have to be
> either a
> billionaire, a large nation/state, or both. And
> several billion seats
> of Windows is enough proof that people are willing to
> pay for an OS
> regardless of whether its source is available or even
> marginally
> functional. I think the real point that everyone is
> missing is that
> despite everyone's hurt feelings this decision has
> been made in order
> to keep Solaris viable and profitable -- something
> that Sun was
> obviously unable to do for much of the past decade.
> 
> -Gary

Delaying source release and the sort of ARC cases
that were previously open reduces participation; not
only contribution, but useful feedback.  I can't guess
whether e.g. Apple, FreeBSD, or Nexenta using some of the
OpenSolaris code cuts into Oracle's profits, although since
Oracle seems to only be interested in customers with deep
pockets, I'd be inclined to suspect that while it may make
some difference, the difference is not large, and may not
be worth the lost good will.

Separate from that is the issue of the license being free
_only_ for the purposes of developing, testing, or presentation
of developer apps.  Desktops, and student and home user access
(at low or no cost to those groups) are essential to holding and
growing mindshare, some of which eventually become paying customers,
and most of which wouldn't be able to pay something like $1000 per
year per socket anyway.  It's not lost revenue, it's cheap (the cost of
the download bandwidth) advertising!
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to