On 09/17/10 12:00 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
"Richard L. Hamilton"<rlha...@smart.net> wrote:
Well...there are probably people that prefer for example
* traditional Solaris command set default vs GNU command set default
This is why few Solaris users did accept Indiana.
* SVR4 packages vs IPS vs whatever packaging scheme Nexenta uses
(there too there's a problem, inasmuch as other tools like beadm and zonecfg
are also involved, although I gather it ought to be possible to come up with
different versions of them for each packaging scheme that some distro or
another uses)
SVR4 packages support sparse zones, IPS does not.
OpenSolaris doesn't have sparse zones, so there nothing to support.
If I remember the threads at the time, they were (rightly) considered
unnecessary now we use ZFS for zone roots.
--
Ian.
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
