> Let me add some numbers... > > We know, that Sun was one of the IT companies, that > spend an enormous > percentage of it's revenue into engineering... More > than 10 percent. If, and > that's now a very crude approach, we then assume, > that that relates to 10% of > the costs also, we can assume, that more than 10% of > Sun's employees have been > engineers. At the "end" Sun had still more than 30000 > employees, so assuming, > that a high percentage might be working on Solaris > might provide us with an > approach to a number close to 1000 engineerhe s... All > very crude and rough > speculation, I can't determine those numbers. >
So why do you try to convince us of something that you don't even know ? What's your motive behind blindly defending Oracle with made up numbers in an OpenSolaris mailing list ? Hoping to close any deals here ? Wrong place, wrong time. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
