> >
> > aggghhhh, I don't like the thought of Garrett
> D'Amore and ZFS co- creator Bill Moore deflecting to
> Nexenta,other opensoalris originators may follow.
> IMO nexenta by hiring some former opensolaris
> devs. is preparing themselves to continue developing
> the opensolaris kernel on their own for their OS,
> just in case the development at the opensolaris
> project comes to a stall. well, by this actions, that
> is the way i'm taking it.
>
> Nexenta is not mulling a fork. The OpenSolaris
> community is still a
> long way from considering that. Oracle has been on
> the silent side,
> but comments from the earlier IRC meetings were
> clear.. ON will
> continue to be developed as it was under Sun.
>
> Nexenta has a active and growing community, and is
> thankful to
> Sun/Oracle for OpenSolaris. Our contributions to
> OpenSolaris will
> continue to grow.
>
> Anil
> (For Nexenta)
>
> PS: I'm with many others on this thread: Speculation
> lends nothing of
> value to the discussion. What's the point of
> indulging in it?
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
Since Oracle in a way have been silent about the actual roadmap for opensolaris
I have trying to fig ure things out by trying to read between the lines
from any actions taken. for instance, this was said:
"It's picking the Sun technologies that are commercializable and focusing on
those, and ignoring those that are not. They are just science projects," said
Ellison
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/174797,ellison-scorns-schwartzs-leadership-of-sun.aspx
I have to wonder which projects are not commercialiable and seen as science
projects and will be ignored?
anyway, one concern of my have been calmed knowing nexenta will contribute to
opensolaris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
