On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:44 +0200, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> You (Stephen Bunn) wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Martin Bochnig <mar...@martux.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Edward Martinez <mindbende...@live.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > it appears the so called writers,reporters from many well respected
> > > news sites are actually in a way wishing the demise of opensolaris.
> > > almost every article written on opensolaris nowadays are about how it's
> > > finished,doomed,etc. I think if this keeps up, it will actually
> > > discourage companies,etc from using this fine OS. I wished there was
> > > something that could be done to stop this.
> > >
> >
> > Martin,
> >
> > While you may be annoyed by the these people, the solutions is actually
> > very simple. Its called a roadmap. It requires leadership and direction.
> > You can't call on the demise of something if there is a clear direction
> > forward. When there is zero communication from the owner of a project its
> > pretty easy to call it dead. It may be FUD and speculation, but when the
> > 'fix' is so damn trivial, the blame lies with Oracle.
> >
> > - Stephen
>
> Folks, also again:
>
> CALM DOWN!
>
> As I stated now MULTIPLE TIMES. Times are changing, GET USED TO IT! Oracle is
> a company (and you can proff it by yourself, if you LOOK BACK at Oracle's
> history of roadmaps and the likes), that ONLY PUBLISHES roadmaps, once the
> INKS ARE DRY!
>
> Do you KNOW anything about the feature set of Oracle's Database its upcoming
> version X, Y or Z?
>
> Is this non-knowledge an indication, that Oracle's DB is DEAD?
>
> So, folks, again, GET USED TO the new communication, and DO NEVER EVER draw
> WRONG conclusions!
>
> It's so easy!
>
> Matthias
+1
Thanks Matthias
--
::alhazred
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
