On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:18:31 PST Michael Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:31:16 PST > > "Richard L. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > lol.. fwiw- i've never in my life encountered a > > mailing list with more > > subscribers who cannot seem to configure their mua's > > to wrap at standard > > 72 characters... this one seems to be >100... > > > > no offense, but talk about newbies... >;^D > > That's the forum software (jive); if there's a way to configure your account > to wrap appropriately when you're posting from the web site, I've yet to > figure it out or hear about it. (admittedly, I haven't looked and I didn't > even realize it was that much of a problem until I tried reading the list > through the pipermail archives). Figured it was some such thing since there is just soooo many messages with long lines.... btw- the comment was more reflection of my wry sense of humor, hence the "no offense" and the smilie.. ">" for devilish, ";" for a wink, culminating with a "D" for big grin :) -- Best regards, Ken Gunderson Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
