Alan DuBoff wrote:

I'll watch to see what Alec might have to say, but in general this is going to be one very high maintenance package, any way we look at it. We do need the software, it just has a lot of strings attached from any perspective we look at it, unless the software is just left vulnerable.

Agreed, and at some level or another, this project will just be packaging what the community around the given component develops, bug for bug complete. I suspect users will understand that already, though it doesn't obviate the need to communicate it.

It'll be a tough balance to strike, since not only is it the version that Zend/MySQL and others ship that the project will need to track, but it may also need to track what's in popular consumption and/or in other packaging projects (i.e. distributions). I will say it's my opinion that while there are many things we *could* do, we should be very judicious about the steps taken so it won't be too much effort to keep up with how the other projects evolve. This is all the more reason the OpenSolaris project community input is important.

- Matt

--
Matt Ingenthron - Web Infrastructure Solutions Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Client Solutions, Systems Practice
http://blogs.sun.com/mingenthron/
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             Phone: 310-242-6439



_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to