Gueven Bay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> And OpenSolaris will not get "uptake" until you - the OpenSolaris community - 
> made it _crystal clear_ to  _normal_ people - not to lawyers in companies - 
> that the CDDL is not a license with which SUN wants to $profit$ . 
>  
> The free software community doesn't like the CDDL and with it OpenSolaris.  
> You can scream. You can rage. But that is a fact. 

If I read "The free software community", I am remided that the communists
in East-Berlin did call East-Berlin the "free and democratic Berlin"...


The people around the GPL (let me call them this way) don't like the CDDL
because the CDDL is a strong license and because you cannot put a GPL header
on front of the CDDL header as it is done frequently with GPLd software.

Note that it took me nearly a week in order to verify that I may remove such
an unfriendly act from ~ 300 lines of code in 4 files used by cdda2wav when
I was going to change the license from GPL to CDDL.

What we need is to fight against untrue claims about the CDDL in a way that
many people will find out how many we are....

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to