On Wednesday 09 August 2006 01:43 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > They use pretty much the same jabs for the Apache 2 license.
Understood, as they do MPL, and others. My concern is not so much the way that the FSF looks at the license even, my concern is that pockets of the open source community are not accepting our license. Maybe my concerns are invalid, but if any licensees of CDDL are facing any type of problem, it can't be good. Do you suggest waiting for GPLv3 to see if it is compatible with CDDL? Seems we loose that much more time in doing so. -- Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
