On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:48:46PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> 
> I have a system here that runs snv_38 and I have a bit of code that cranks a
> large pile of numbers about.  All of this is integer operations with the
> exception of maybe two lines that require floating point.  That would be two
> lines out of about 200 lines of addition, subtractions, integer comparisons
> etc etc and all in all the code bit runs for about 19 secs.
> 
> Now mpstat reports that one proc is totally tied up with the process thus :
> 
> $ mpstat 2
...
> CPU minf mjf xcal  intr ithr  csw icsw migr smtx  srw syscl  usr sys  wt idl
>   0    0   0   35  5414  210  103    0    2    0    0   162    0   4   0  96
>   1    0   0 5103    81    3    2    3    0    0    0     4    0 100   0   0
                                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...

This indicates that almost no time is being spent in userland, and one CPU
is busy only doing kernel work.  You probably have either a kernel thread
or heavy interrupt traffic eating up CPU 1.

If you want to investigate, something like:

dtrace -n '[EMAIL PROTECTED]()] = count()}' -n 'END{trunc(@a,20)}' \
    -c './r'

will give you the most common kernel stacks while your process is running.
There might be a clue from that.

...
>    PID USERNAME  SIZE   RSS STATE  PRI NICE      TIME  CPU PROCESS/NLWP
>   1996 dclarke  1020K  704K cpu1     0    0   0:00:17  29% r/1
>   1994 dclarke  2772K 2476K cpu0    59    0   0:00:00 0.2% prstat/1
>   1995 dclarke  2084K 1336K sleep   59    0   0:00:00 0.1% mpstat/1
>   1978 dclarke    11M 3388K sleep   59    0   0:00:00 0.0% sshd/1
>   1921 dclarke    11M 3388K sleep   59    0   0:00:00 0.0% sshd/1
...
> So either mpstat is telling me that one processor is indeed totally busy or
> prstat is telling me that something called "r" is just taking 29% of the
> system CPU resources at its peak.

The CPU measurement ramps up slowly.  The "PRI" of 0 indicates that you are
heavily CPU bound.

You should look at the prstat -m information for your process;  it will
let you know precisely where its time is being spent.  (the results are not
decayed)

Cheers,
- jonathan


-- 
Jonathan Adams, Solaris Kernel Development
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to