[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >James Carlson wrote:
> >[snip]
> >> As for strMANYcat, the operation seems sort of obvious and somewhat
> >> useful, but I wonder how often in real, well-written code this
> >> situation actually comes up _and_ snprintf isn't a better answer.
> >
> >Umpf. See my original posting. My intention was to improve performance
> >and usuability. |snprintf()| would make it slower. MUCH slower.
> >
> >And: snprintf() may be evil - see Mozilla.org Bug 332006
> >(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332006 - "Avoid raw calls
> >to snprintf").
> 
> Except that that bug is wrong:
> 
>         snprintf does not promise to null terminate the result buffer.
> 
> was never true on any OS I know of.
> 
> It would be useless if it were truee.

Seems this is a Microsoft compiler issue (see new comments in
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332006) ... ;-/

----

Bye,
Roland

-- 
  __ .  . __
 (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
  /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
 (;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to