>We should think to have /bin/sh as ksh93. It is elegant and simple to do. Are >there any objections why /bin/sh cannot be a ksh93 ? > >On other note: Im wonder what would happen with kstat(1M) when Perl6 would be >out. I bet Perl5 wou ld stay as it is somewhere around and Perl6 might be installed some other place.
I think we'd love to be able to make that change but I don't think we can. (If we could, we're replaced /bin/sh with ksh88 long before) Casper _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
