> Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote: > > for Debian packages to work, you need to adopt the > entire Debian way of thinking. > > Bells and whistles and all. > > > But it'll be a fight against both the OpenSolaris > community and > > What are the core differences WRT the "way Sun has > traditionally done > sfw and the companion CD"? A list or comparison > would do quite a bit > to move this discussion from "theory/grandstanding" > to "a potential plan". > > The current sfw/ccd "architecture" is obviously not > meeting all of our > current needs, where "our" includes the community, > the end users and even > SMI itself. This discussion has pointed out several > of these shortcomings: > hard to keep up with the suppliers > hard to produce a "linux like" build environment for > r other stuff > hard to manage dependencies > ...etc...
The "...etc..." would include the missing security patches from down rev software. ---Bob This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list [email protected]
