Richard Lowe wrote: ----- > > "previous releases with complete source encumbrance" is impossible to handle > (< 10), for Nevada and above, I can't think of any problem with sustaining > gates being available containing the open parts of the tree, for those parts > of the source base that are open (ON's usr/src, JDS, SFW, pkg tools, etc). > > So I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to here, could you be more > explicit? >
What does it actually mean? moving all sustaining projects S8,S9 and S10 (update releases) under Opensolaris umbrella? or it just a long term plan? mikhail _______________________________________________ opensolaris-code mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
