> So, the question is, what are we doing now. In my eyes the whole situation > is very similar to what we have regarding H/V light signals in Germany, > where there are at least 3 types all tagged the same as they have the same > meaning, they just differ in how they are built. > > I would think adding another subtag like ":version", ":generation", ":shape" > or something for all of these cases, and then do something like > > railway:signal:train_protection = nl:227b > railway:signal:train_protection:shape = triangle
I turned this into a proposal in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/railway:signal:*:shape Please add images of the NL signals if you have them and can share them (please also consider adding them to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/ Category:Railway_signals_in_the_Netherlands). This is a draft. I would welcome if you could come up with additional wording on the discussion page, I will transfer it to the main page then.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
