Am 2016-09-26 12:24, schrieb Mauro Costantini:
Thank you so much. Btw, in the same manner, should we move from "railway=abandoned" (wich told nothing about the type of the railway) to the newer tagging scheme "abandoned:railway=*" in order to be consistent with the namespaces life cycle perefixes (and mantain the information about the railway's type) ?
That is already what we do, in some way. Active: railway=rail;*=* <here comes the bulldozer> Removed: railway=abandoned;abandoned:railway=rail;abandoned:*=* Eike _______________________________________________ Openrailwaymap mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openrailwaymap.org/lists/listinfo/openrailwaymap
