Hi! On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Evan Hunter <ehun...@broadcom.com> wrote:
> You are right – Looking at it again, the “qP” code looks like I got halfway > through implementing it, then found that I should be using qThreadExtraInfo > instead. > > Please feel free to remove it. The only reason I haven’t already is that > I’ve not had time.**** > > ** > Ok, will do. Since you're familiar with the code, could you comment on the return value patch I just posted ( http://openocd.zylin.com/38 ). I'm just guessing here but it seems reasonable enough. Thanks, Andreas
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
