On 08:39 Fri 17 Jun , Michael Schwingen wrote: > Am 06/17/2011 03:15 AM, schrieb Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to propose the following release cycle > > > > For the people familiar with Linux kernel its basically the same > > > > 2 development window: > > merge window > > fix window > > > > We will get 2 weeks of merge window where any code can be merge in the > > master branch. After will start the fix window of 6 weeks to stabilized > > the code. During the first week of the fix window reviewed patches that > > are > > not too much intrusive could be merged if they miss the merge window. > > Otherwise ONLY fix will be merge in the master branch. > This looks a bit fast, given that OpenOCD development seems to work > quite a bit slower than eg. Linux or u-boot. > > I don't think we need 6 releases per year - something like 2-4 releases > / year should be sufficient, IMHO. 2 is too short IMHO 4 is a bit short but ok
as we have a short merge windows and openocd is not as complex as the kenel 6 weeks for rc seems good Personnaly 6 releases is a good number > > Apart from that, I like the proposal. kernel is 8weeks fix window barebox is monthly release u-boot is the same as the kernel (3 month release) Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
