On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagn...@jcrosoft.com> wrote: > On 08:17 Fri 17 Jun , Ųyvind Harboe wrote: >> Some questions/comments: >> >> - if we look at the current way we work with OpenOCD, we just >> commit stuff to the master branch without regards to a release. >> I would like this to continue in the same manner, which I don't >> think is in conflict with what you write. > in this case you do it on the next branch > > the master branch is the release branch it's like this in most of the project > > buildroot, kernel, barebox, u-boot etc...
I think doing things somewhat similar to other projects, but not exactly the same is OK. OpenOCD is very unlike Linux: resources, pace, quality, etc. I'd like to see the master branch used exactly as today with a pull request being sent from the release manager when the release is ready... -- Øyvind Harboe Can Zylin Consulting help on your project? US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27 http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex JTAG debugger and flash programmer _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
