+++ Øyvind Harboe [2011-03-22 09:23 +0100]: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Tomek CEDRO <tomek.ce...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> > > wrote: > > > cortex a8 and a9 are very similar, so they should be merged and > > > conditional code used + configuration options. > > > > > > cortex m3 is more mature(hence breakage is more of an issue) and > > > much more different so merging *all* cortex code is further down the > > > road. > > > > Aaah, maybe "cortex_m.c" and "cortex_a.c" then? :-) > > Sounds sensible to me.
Yep - this is in line with how the chip families are designed (and marketed). At some point we might find we can't accomodate all cortex-A CPUs in one file (don't know how much they changed re JTAG in A15, for example), but until then it makes sense to treat them as a closely-relate family. Then we have separate Cortex R and Cortex M support. Now that I'm inside ARM I poke people about OpenOCD when I get the chance. The people here have lots of access to the really expensive stuff so openOCD is not that high on the radar, but it is known about and isn't being entirely ignored, which is a good start. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
