On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.har...@zylin.com> wrote: > In target.c, I'm wondering if we should modify the code to execute > the same code path and have support for no new packages, unless > the target->rtos is initialized.
Hello! This modular design of OpenOCD is so awsome when I look at it now - it adds possibility to attach totally different functionalities together, and only basics are hardcoded to add more functionalities by tcl :-) I think rtos should be additional module for target (or cpu just as flash is) so it brings new functionalities without modification of old ones and even further extensibility by tcl scripts... I was thinking of something like this for linux/android in future :-) Regarding the organization - the module can be named "rtos" and the specific os would be selected just as layout (as is in the cpu or flash memory).. therefore rtos should be kept in separate folder (such as flash, svf, etc) instead extending existing sources (such target.c) imo. Best regards! Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
