On Tuesday 22 March 2011 12:16:47 Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Michael Schwingen > > <rincew...@discworld.dascon.de> wrote: > > Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> I'm wondering if it would be better to ditch the automatic fixup > >> code and use parameters to target in config script. > >> > >> Default would be to use the automatic detection per ARM's > >> specification. > > > > Since auto-detecting the broken devices seems to be problematic, I think > > that would be a good approach, because it has zero chance of breaking > > non-affected devices. > > Sold then... > > Patch anyone? > > Wasn't this what was proposed in the first place? :-) > > Autodetect of a few broken devices would have been sweet, but I suppose > we couldn't get away with it this time...
I wanted to have an option for debug base in config file at the begining, but was pushed to make the auto-detect code ;-) Sorry I didn't have further look at the code, work totaled me. Cheers _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
