Hi, Freddie Chopin wrote: > I've CCed Peter Stuge, as he's another person that has different > opinion on this subject than official version from NXP.
Thanks. I have had significant development issues both with LPC2148 and LPC1768 having reset_config srst_pulls_trst in their target files. It was impossible to control either microcontroller with srst_pulls_trst set. In case of 2148 it was a matter of my code generating an exception before OpenOCD could take control. Since the pins were independent on chip and JTAG connector I tried removing srst_pulls_trst and that immediately allowed me to reliably control the CPU. I was quite annoyed at whomever had set this option. It took me a while to discover the first time. Especially as it was my first project using OpenOCD. I only patched these two target configs as I encountered the issue on each of them, specifically because I thought that maybe this was something that had been true for earlier LPC2000 and had been extrapolated to all of the configs. Since Freddie needs it also for 2103 I guess it's plain wrong, and only some really badly designed boards need it. (Agree, we need that capability infrastructure.) > You say this option is required, I say it's not, the experiments > show reliable debugging etc. so where's the problem? I will violently oppose any attempt to add the option back to config files for 2148 and 1768. Expect all sorts of bits and bytes thrown at you. It has wasted enough of my life time already thank you very much. //Peter _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
