On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Laurent Gauch <laurent.ga...@amontec.com> wrote: > Yes true, but actually I will recommend to still use D2XX drivers and build > your openocd for d2xx driver. > > D2XX driver is actually still faster than libusb driver on Windows ...
For this reason, right now it is true that FTDI D2xx driver is still better. On the other hand, as per the GPL discussion in this list last time, it is not allowed to redistribute openocd_d2xx. So it is a problem for end users who do not want to build OpenOCD by their own. So Freddie's libftdi based OpenOCD under Windows will still be popular. ;-) BTW, I personally tend to not agree with the assertion that dynamically linking to ftd2xx.dll violates GPL, Many others like Freddie and even the original author do not agree with that assertion either. But that is an issue probably only lawyers can solve. -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
