On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:17 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> > I'd think serial numbers would suffice, and >> > be much more usable/stable. >> > >> I think a USB device is not required to have >> a serial number, > > But FTDI devices *DO* ... all I've seen. In fact > the current FT232 usb-to-serial parts are all > manufactured by FTDI with unique serials; it's > part of what they advertise.
I thought this was true as well. But it seems there are some exceptions. Please refer to this thread (or two threads). https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-June/thread.html#15785 -- Xiaofan _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
