On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > Though with the patch below I'm at the same speed as > arm7/9. This patch should be clean and it's just refactoring > the existing code into a fn basically so I'm kinda hoping that > we have time yet to push it for 0.4: > > https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-February/014652.html
Let's save that for 0.5 instead ... Spen has a bunch of other performance tweaks too. These things are interface updates, and don't fit the RC-phase merge criteria I posted https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2009-December/013779.html > For developers, patch priorities become more or less: > > - Fixes for regressions ... stuff that broke since 0.3.1 > or older releases. > > - Fixes for other bugs ... maybe it never worked, or you > don't quite know when it broke. Or it's a new feature > which doesn't yet behave quite right. > > - "Polishing" ... doc updates, new config files, and so on. > Build fixes. If there's a rough edge, make it smooth! > Messages should make sense, not be too noisy, and so on. > Let's try to avoid cosmetic cleanup, but fixes for those > "didn't check for malloc returning NULL" bugs should be > OK for a while yet. Performance updates don't fit as bugfixes or as polishing. I'm thinking we should be nearly ready to call 0.4 "done"... - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
