On Tuesday 26 January 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > I don't like the fact that the introduced arm_semi_hosting > structure (which could have been done in a patch of its own btw) is > carrying fields that are valid only for one particular instance of a > semihosting call and therefore should have been kept local to the > implementation rather than growing the arm structure uselessly. Those > are "result" and "core_cache".
As I commented elsewhere, my approach was going to be making the v7-M code use the standard ARM base "class". That would cover both of those issues, and help reduce needless divergence in user model... > I think that getting r0 and r1 should be > abstracted out of do_semihosting() and passed directly by both callers > instead, etc. It would cover that too. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
