On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:13 PM, David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Sunday 17 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 9:56 PM, simon qian <simonqian.open...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > see http://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?p=90983#90983.
>> > Can anybody try this?
>>
>> If you can confirm that this solves the problem, I would want
>> a comment that explains why this is necessary.
>>
>> If somebody goes in and rewrites that code later on, they need
>> to know that there are compatibility(?) problems out there to
>> deal with.
>
> The patch reads a bit oddly -- why would any type of parsing
> code *add* characters instead of taking them out of the buffer??

Because modifying the input is easier than parsing it correctly?

If nobody can confirm that this fixes the problem, then there isn't
a reason to clean up the patch though...

-- 
Øyvind Harboe
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 63 25 00
http://www.zylin.com/zy1000.html
ARM7 ARM9 ARM11 XScale Cortex
JTAG debugger and flash programmer
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to