On Thursday 14 January 2010, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > So essentially the codepath for RESET_HAS_SRST is unchanged?
That's the idea, yes. If neither of us see a difference, then that concept seems to have been achieved. :) > In that case I don't have a problem with this as RESET_HAS_SRST==0 is really > a new feature anyway. That was my hope. Plus, it's best if all the new ARM support for that kicks in in the same release -- minimize user confusion. I'll commit this tomorrow then, if nobody objects to this simplified version. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
